Volkswagen unveils new Tiguan Compact 4x4

Volkswagen has taken the wraps off its new Tiguan compact 4x4 which will go on sale in February 2008, following its world public debut at the Frankfurt Motor Show in September. Based on the Concept Tiguan that made its debut at the Los Angeles Motor Show last year, the Tiguan is slightly larger than the Volkswagen Touran compact MPV and an appearance which reinforces its strong links to its ‘big brother’, the Touareg. In the UK, the Tiguan will initially be available with two engines – a 2.0-litre 140 PS TDI diesel which is likely to be the most popular model, and a 1.4-litre 150 PS TSI petrol unit. Later in 2008 a 170 PS TDI and two further petrol engines will become available to order.

The Tiguan is slightly larger than the Volkswagen Touran compact MPV at 4.4 metres long, 1.8 metres wide and 1.6 metres in height. It has a purposeful appearance which reinforces its strong links to its ‘big brother’, the Touareg, with raised suspension, large tyres and true 4x4 styling cues.

In the UK, the Tiguan will initially be available with two engines – a 2.0-litre 140 PS TDI diesel which is likely to be the most popular model, and a 1.4-litre 150 PS TSI petrol unit. Later in 2008 a 170 PS TDI and two further petrol engines will become available to order. Both diesel engines meet the stringent Euro 5 emissions standard that comes into effect in 2009.

S, SE and Sport models will be offered at launch, all with 4MOTION four-wheel drive and an 18 degree angle of approach, a figure that defines the size of obstruction the vehicle can drive over. Customers requiring additional off-road capability can choose a 28 degree angle of approach front end. This model comes with a radiator protection grille, underbody protection, hill descent control and a compass.

UK pricing is expected to start at around UKP 19,000 (US$38,000), with Volkswagen Retailers due to start taking orders for the new car in November.


New smart fortwo BRABUS - 30% more power

German automotive performance company Brabus regularly graces our pages, most notably by continually breaking its own record for the world’s fastest sedan. The name is synonymous with Mercedes and Smart performance tuning and the company’s latest effort involves the next generation Smart fortwo. With a reengineered 72 kW/98 bhp three cylinder turbo engine the smart fortwo BRABUS and the smart fortwo BRABUS Xclusive have 30 percent more power than before and still boast low fuel consumption. The sporty two-seater accelerates from zero to 100 km/h in 9.9 seconds and reaches a top speed of 155 km/h. Ex factory prices for the pocket rockets range from EUR16,490 (US$22,160) to EUR 22,430 (US$30,150) depending on the equipment line and body type.

The sporty character of the new smart fortwo BRABUS is immediately apparent. For example, it features "Monoblock VI" alloy wheels with wide tyres measuring 175/50 R 16 at the front and 225/35 R 17 at the rear, wider rear wheel arches, a sports exhaust system with centrally positioned stainless steel tailpipes and a body that has been lowered by ten millimetres. In the interior cockpit instruments with specially designed dials, BRABUS sports pedals and a three-spoke leather steering wheel with shift paddles underline the exclusiveness of this model. The transmission and suspension also have a sporty setup.

The smart fortwo BRABUS Xclusive lives up to its name with additional equipment details such as H7 projection headlamps with titanium coloured surrounds, a front spoiler with enlarged air inlets, striking side skirts and a rear apron painted in the colour of the body. The seats are covered with fine leather and are heated. The leather-effect instrument panel features aluminium-look trim components.

Both BRABUS models of the new smart fortwo are available as a coupé or a cabrio.

The turbo engine that has been improved in numerous details is the heart of the new smart fortwo BRABUS. From capacity of one litre the three-cylinder engine now develops 72 kW/98 bhp at 5500 rpm and lends the 770 kilogram two-door car remarkable agility. The weight to power ratio is just 7.8 kg/bhp - 24 percent lower than that of the previous BRABUS variant.

The turbo in-line engine develops maximum torque of 140 Newton metres at 3500 rpm. The BRABUS variant of the smart fortwo sprints from zero to 100 km/h in 9.9 seconds and reaches an electronically limited top speed of 155 km/h.

With combined fuel consumption of just 5.2 litres per 100 kilometres the new smart fortwo BRABUS is one of the most economical cars in its size and power category. Carbon dioxide emissions stand at 124 grams per kilometre.

Delphi gains deal with its union

Struggling US car parts maker Delphi says it has reached an outline deal with its main union to allow it to cut wages and exit bankruptcy protection.

Although no details have been released, it is understood that the United Auto Workers union has agreed to see hourly wages reduced from $27 to $18.50.

The deal will come as a major relief for General Motors (GM), Delphi's former parent and main customer.

Any strike by Delphi workers would have quickly hit production at GM plants.

Although the agreement still needs to be ratified by Delphi workers, analysts say this is all but a formality.

"We believe this agreement will be a significant milestone in our transformation and a major step towards emergence," said Delphi's chief restructuring officer John Sheehan.

Spun out from GM in 1999, Delphi filed for Chapter 11 US bankruptcy protection in 2005 after racking up huge losses.

Handicapped by high wages and generous healthcare and pensions provision, Delphi has also been affected by cheaper competitors from China and other Asian nations.

GM's own problems

The settlement between Delphi and the United Auto Workers (UAW) comes after more than 20 months of tough discussions, which also included GM representatives.

GM was involved not just because it remains Delphi's main customer, but also because it has had to financially prop up its former subsidiary.

The carmaker estimates that the difficulties at Delphi have cost it more than $7bn (£3.5bn).

GM, which is itself trying to turn around its fortunes after making large losses, now has to seek its own agreement with the UAW.

Chapter 11 bankruptcy projection gives a US firm time to restructure its finances while protected from its creditors.

KPMG 'helping Ford sell Jaguar'

Ford has hired accountancy giant KPMG to go over the books at its Jaguar and Land Rover subsidiaries, says a report.

If the Sunday Times article is confirmed, it would show that Ford is moving ahead with plans to sell the two UK-based units.

Although Ford has yet to confirm it intends to sell Jaguar and Land Rover, the BBC learned earlier this month that it had already briefed MPs on the move.

No-one at Ford or KPMG was available for comment on the new development.

Falling profits

Ford has so far said it has been studying the future of Jaguar and Land Rover for a year, and that it was neither setting a timeframe for any decision, nor ruling out any options.

Union leaders have voiced concerns about possible redundancies at the two units should their sale go ahead.

Jaguar has about 10,000 staff at sites in Coventry, Birmingham and Liverpool, while Land Rover employs about 9,000 in the West Midlands and Warwickshire.

Ford, which has been selling assets in a bid to offset falling sales and profits, earlier this year sold Aston Martin.

Analysts say that the sale of Jaguar and Land Rover could raise as much as $1.5bn (£750m).

G.M. to Alter Tiger Woods’s Role in Its Ads

DETROIT, June 21 — After eight years as the face of Buick, Tiger Woods is still less than half the age of an average Buick owner.

And from now on, General Motors plans to spend less time convincing people that Mr. Woods actually wants to drive a Buick and use him instead as a pitchman in companywide ads for products like OnStar, a communications service offered by all eight G.M. brands.

Mark R. LaNeve, G.M.’s vice president for vehicle sales and marketing in North America, said Thursday that the automaker wants its ads to focus on its products rather than on Mr. Woods.

“I don’t want a celebrity at the very core of any of the brands,” Mr. LaNeve told reporters. “We want the message on Buick to be what Buick’s true north is, which is classic, premium American vehicles. Tiger should be on the periphery helping us do that.”

Mr. Woods, 31, has been with Buick since December 1999. G.M. has signed him to represent the company through 2009, when his five-year contract, reportedly worth $40 million, expires.

Although his prominence has helped Buick gain visibility, experts question whether the millions of dollars that G.M. spends on Mr. Woods has had any real effect on the century-old brand, which now produces just three models. The average Buick buyer is 63 years old, according to the Power Information Network.

“There was just no believability that Tiger was dying to drive a Buick,” said Laura Ries, president of Ries & Ries, a marketing strategy firm in Atlanta.

“The brand personalities just didn’t go together, like oil and water,” she said. “Buick is an older person’s car. Tiger is very young, very cool and at the top of his game. You imagine him driving a Bentley or a Mercedes or a Lexus.”

Mr. LaNeve said such criticism was not a factor in G.M.’s decision to change Mr. Woods’s role, saying Mr. Woods is a “great asset” for the automaker and “does a great job for us.”

Whenever Mr. Woods appears in a future G.M. ad, he will be shown driving a Buick, Mr. LaNeve said. He currently appears in a television spot for OnStar that also features the talk show hosts Kelly Ripa and Jimmy Kimmel; Mr. Woods is seen asking an OnStar operator to unlock the door to his Buick Enclave, the brand’s new crossover vehicle, after inadvertently locking his golf shirt and keys inside.

“He’s got an association with General Motors,” Mr. LaNeve said, “so why shouldn’t we use him beyond just Buick?”

Buick officials said Mr. Woods recently took delivery of a fully loaded Enclave CXL. He also drives a Buick Lucerne and several other G.M. vehicles.

Sale Possible as Ford Considers Its Options for Jaguar and Land Rover

DEARBORN, Mich., June 12 — First, Aston Martin left the Ford Motor Company fold. Will Jaguar and Land Rover follow?

Ford said Tuesday that it was working with financial advisers to sort out the future of the two British brands, which have been rumored to be up for sale for more than a year.

The comments were the strongest yet from Ford, which previously had denied any plans to sell Jaguar and Land Rover. They come as Ford is trying to reverse a $12.6 billion loss in 2006 and raise money for its restructuring effort.

“As we’ve consistently been saying since last year, Ford Motor Company has been assessing a number of strategic options for all of our operations, as any responsible company would do,” a Ford spokesman, Tom Hoyt, said Tuesday. “Ford is actively investigating its options in terms of other possible actions, and we’re not ruling anything in or out.”

He went on, “We are working with our financial advisers to determine the best future for Jag and Land Rover.”

The statement comes about three months after Ford sold Aston Martin, maker of the sports cars driven by the movie spy James Bond, for $848 million to a group of investors led by the racing mogul David Richards. At that time, Ford said it was not looking to sell the other divisions of its Premier Automotive Group, which include Jaguar, Land Rover and the Swedish carmaker Volvo.

Although Mr. Hoyt did not say directly that Jaguar and Land Rover were being put up for sale, his comments brought to mind remarks by DaimlerChrysler’s chief executive, Dieter Zetsche, as he sought bidders this year for the Chrysler Group.

In February, Mr. Zetsche said that Daimler was considering “all options” for Chrysler, which it sold last month to Cerberus Capital Management.

Mr. Hoyt did not discuss Volvo, but some analysts and industry executives say it, too, could be sold as Ford’s chief executive, Alan R. Mulally, focuses on fixing Ford’s core operations in North America.

Jon Rogers, an analyst with Citigroup, estimated that Ford could get $7 billion for Volvo and $8 billion collectively for Jaguar and Land Rover. Because Jaguar and Land Rover share parts and production facilities, selling them individually could be difficult, Mr. Rogers said.

Ford bought Jaguar in 1989, Volvo’s car operations in 1999 and Land Rover in 2000. It once hoped the luxury division could earn upward of $1 billion a year.

Instead, the Premier group has lost $1.15 billion over the last three years. Ford has said it expects the brands to be profitable this year; they earned $402 million in the first quarter. But analysts said losses most likely had continued at Jaguar. The division has been a constant source of problems for Ford, which purchased it for $2.5 billion.

One potential buyer, Jon Moulton, a managing partner of the private equity firm Alchemy Partners in London, said he was interested in Jaguar and Land Rover “on an emotional level.” But he said he thought that they would command a higher price than he would wish to bid.

In a telephone interview, Mr. Moulton said that he expected an equity firm or a buyer in the Middle East or Russia rather than another car maker to purchase Jaguar and Land Rover. The least likely option, Mr. Moulton said, would be for Ford to retain ownership.

“I think a sale will have to go through,” he said. “Ford’s ability to continue feeding them cash is increasingly restricted. They are two very interesting brand names. Neither of them has really made much money for their owners over the last 20 years, but the allure of them is very obvious.”

Strong Mini demand drives up BMW



German carmaker BMW saw its group-wide sales rise 7% last month, helped by strong demand for its UK-made Mini.

BMW said sales of the Mini, which was revamped last autumn, rose 14% in May from a year earlier to 19,864 cars.

Meanwhile, sales of the firm's core BMW brand rose 5.8% last month to 108,488, lifted by the popularity of its latest X5 model and new 3 Series coupe.

The Munich-based group now forecasts it will sell 1.4 million BMWs, Minis and Rolls-Royce cars this year.

At BMW's main German rivals, Mercedes-Benz saw its sales grow just 2.9% last month, while those at Audi have added a monthly average of 10% this year.

Last month BMW reported that its profit fell 34% in the first three months of 2007 following heavy investment in new models.

Turned Down for an Auto Loan? There are Options

(ARA) – In the current climate of declining property values, higher interest rates, and changes in available mortgage products, more and more homeowners are becoming delinquent or going into foreclosure. Many folks are losing their hat, their home and their good credit, through no fault of their own.

In addition, as a result of these challenges, many Americans also face the difficulty of getting approved for a car loan. Crawling out of the hole that a bad credit score creates can take years of persistence and patience. So, what can Americans in that predicament do until their score goes up? And what can they do to help get their scores up?

There are many lenders out there who understand this dilemma and offer an excellent way to start the long process of credit recovery. An auto loan with a trend of on-time payments is a great way to reestablish credit. A great place to start the loan process is online at a site like Car.com, a popular consumer automotive information site committed to helping customers with special finance needs get approved for a loan and into the right vehicle.

Car.com is a free service that works with a nationwide network of finance companies and dealers to help customers with special finance needs. The service connects consumers with a dealer or lender who operates in the consumer’s area, who specializes in secondary finance, and who is dedicated to helping car-buyers get the vehicle they want at a price they can afford. The advantage a site like Car.com provides is that consumers who have been turned down by other dealers or banks have an opportunity to find the right lender for their particular situation online and in the comfort of their own home.

“Knowing we would have to work with a bank that handled ‘second chance’ cases, I thought that they would put us in a cheap car, but this was not the case! They showed us a VW Jetta that was right within our price range and looked and drove like new!” says Kellie M., Waycross, Ga.

A site like Car.com also provides help for students or first-time car buyers, who struggle from the catch 22: How do you get a loan if you don’t have credit, since you need credit to get a loan? Car.com believes that there is a lender for everyone.

Here is how the process works: Click on Car.com to help find your car loan, the online questionnaire only takes a few minutes to complete. Car.com then securely delivers your information to its network of third party lenders and dealers. Loan decisions normally occur within hours. While you’re there, if you need to find out your credit rating, use Experian Automotive to receive a copy of your credit report online.

Also at Car.com you can search for a vehicle, see vehicle reviews, previews, videos, histories and discussions. Find a form, fill out the short application and learn about financing. You can compare vehicles and figure out your payment schedule with an online payment calculator.

To find out what vehicle you will qualify for, fill out the short application at www.car.com, and start improving your credit.

Copyright © 2007, ARAnet, inc.

Scion’s youthful xB good for grown-ups too

In designing the new, bigger 2008 version of its cult-hit Scion xB subcompact cube, Toyota took a leaf out of General Motors Vice Chairman Bob Lutz’s book.

In “Guts,” which he wrote after his departure from Chrysler in 1998, Lutz outlines his Immutable Laws of Business. Rule No. 1: “The customer is not always right.” That may sound heretical in this age of customer satisfaction, but consider this passage:

“Most people buy subcompacts because that is what they can afford, not because they have some warped desire to sit with their knees up around their chest,” Lutz wrote. “Thus, when asked what they’d like changed about their cars, it’s axiomatic that subcompact owners would like them bigger.”

Lutz even prescribed how much bigger. The number he named — four inches longer in wheelbase — is exactly the amount Toyota has stretched its new Scion xB, even at a time when consumers are showing increased interest in smaller cars.

Why? Because just as Lutz said they would nearly a decade ago, although xB owners love their cars, they want then to be just a little bit bigger explains Steve Haag, Scion’s corporate manager.

Stretching the xB has moved it up a class — from a subcompact to a compact car by EPA standards — and that doesn’t make it a bad car. It’s actually a very good car that is likely to have much broader appeal than its iconoclastic predecessor, but it seems less likely than the old car to serve its intended purpose.

Scion is Toyota’s effort to attract younger car buyers. The Toyota brand is so entrenched with retirement-age baby boomers that the company’s average customer age is looking more like Buick’s. Scion has successfully attracted younger customers, and Haag says Toyota genuinely prefers to sell fewer Scions, as long as they help pull a new generation of customers into Toyota’s camp.

In this regard, Scion’s first three models — the xA, the xB and especially the tC coupe with its average customer age of 25 — have succeeded marvelously. By contrast, Honda’s similarly developed Element SUV failed in this mission, attracting older customers who appreciated its practicality and who might have thought its unorthodox styling made them look young and hip.

By making the new xB a larger, more comfortable, more expensive and more practical car, Scion runs the risk of seeing the average age of its buyers climb as quickly as their cholesterol numbers. The danger is that the intended twenty-something hipster buyers will soon see Scions piloted by gray-hairs on every corner.

Practical-minded customers flock to the Scion xB because it’s a great car at a great price. It employs the versatile small wagon/four-door hatchback body style that packs the most interior space in the least exterior space, and it’s large enough for adults with families to look at it as a fuel-efficient family car instead of a small wagon or SUV.

And while the xB’s increased length means it’s less appealing to drivers faced with the challenges of urban parking, it will be more appealing to older suburbanites wanting to pack in their families.

The xB maintains its cubist exterior design, but the new version sports beveled corners where the old car featured the sheer facets of a cut diamond. These softened edges and integrated bumpers give the new car a fresher, sleeker appearance. Gone is the old car’s petulant lower lip of a front bumper, but the hugely stretched length and extended front and rear overhangs imbalance the car’s proportions, giving it a bit of a dachshund look.

Inside, the xB’s low price mandates hard, cheap surfaces everywhere, but at least those cheap surfaces are textured and have a matte finish. The dashboard feigns continuity with the old car’s useless center-mounted instrument panel, which inconveniently positioned the gauges where they could be read by back-seat drivers, but no one else. The central instrument pod remains, but the large digital speedometer and analog tachometer are offset to the left, bringing them closer to the driver’s normal line of sight.

The larger xB has abundant leg room in both the front seats and the rear, where even with the front seats drawn back there’s still plenty of space. An extra 2.8 inches of width means that unlike the older model the new xB has a back seat that is wide enough for the car to be a true five-seater. The rear cargo hold has also grown, with ample space available behind the back seat. There is plenty of room for a couple child seats and space in back for a stroller.

On the road, the xB’s electric power steering exhibits some of the characteristic numbness and lack of feedback for which such systems are derided, but the expectations in this area aren’t high for an economy car.

The car’s handling is sure and the ride is a clear improvement over that of the old xB, which at times felt busy. The five-speed manual transmission slips slickly from one gear to the next, and the shifter’s location (sticking out from the dashboard — a bit like the Honda Element) puts it in easy reach. The clutch pedal is so light, though, that it’s hard to feel the friction point as the clutch begins to engage.

A bigger, stronger and thirstier 2.4-liter engine moves the xB with far more authority than the old car’s puny, 1.5-liter powerplant, but of course it demands more fuel to do so. It’s hard to compare the mileage of the two cars because the EPA’s tougher test for 2008 models yields lower numbers. In the xB’s case, the score with the new test is 22 MPG in the city and 28 MPG on the highway. That’s good, but not the sort of amazing numbers small car buyers expect.

The xB’s added size and weight have improved its safety. Toyota’s internal tests predict that the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety will rate the xB a “good” in front and side impacts, but Toyota made the same prediction for the new Tundra truck and fell short, so we’ll have to wait and see. The xB also features electronic stability control as standard equipment. It’s proven to dramatically reduce the incidence of crashes, so Scion deserves plaudits for including it.

In keeping with Scion’s aim to involve owners with their cars, there’s a full line of parts to help drivers soup up their xB, and even with lower-riding springs and bigger wheels installed, the xB’s ride and handling are still excellent. This isn’t typically the case for lowered cars. Similarly, an optional cold air intake system and a low-restriction exhaust each boost horsepower, but they don’t spoil the experience by making the car too noisy.

Young drivers who do buy an xB will find these optional extras strongly compelling, as long as they have the extra dough to pay for them. And by giving drivers what they asked for in a larger, more practical car, Toyota has delivered a Scion that’s fit for grown-ups too.


Revisiting the 1957 Sales Numbers

In the May 20 feature, “Fifty, Finned and Fabulous,” it was noted that in 1957 Ford took the sales title from Chevrolet for the first time.

While that’s generally accepted as true, there is more than one way of looking at the sales numbers in the auto industry that year.

The final tally, according to our trusty reference, the Standard Catalog (Krause Publications), was 1,522,406 for Ford versus 1,515,177 for Chevrolet, a difference of 7,359 units.

Clear enough? Not so fast. The distinction is that Ford sold more 1957 Fords during the 1957 model year than Chevrolet sold of its 1957 Chevrolets.

But Chevrolet actually sold 136 more cars during the 1957 model “calendar year” than Ford.

Confused? The thing was, some 7,359 of the Chevrolets sold during that time period were leftover 1956 models.

From a production standpoint, Ford churned out 1,655,065 of its 1957 model Fords. But the final 132,659 of those wound up being sold outside the 1957 calendar year.

Those carryover models, coupled with a deep recession in the country’s economy, fouled Ford sales for 1958. Oh, and don’t forget the introduction of the Edsel that year. Production of 1958 Ford models dropped to just 967,954 units. Ouch!

Chevrolet handily regained the sales title, even though the recession helped drive its sales down to just 1.2 million units.

A Hybrid of Nonsensical Thinking

The Honda Accord Hybrid was killed on Monday. Honda will not have an Accord Hybrid in its line when the next-generation Accord arrives this fall.

This was not much of a surprise, since the Accord Hybrid really didn’t deliver on the key reason people buy hybrids: fuel mileage.

But wait, there’s more: The Accord Hybrid, introduced in 2004 with a V-6 engine, cost significantly more than the gasoline version and about $5,000 more than the four-cylinder Toyota Camry Hybrid it competed against. Also, an Accord with a four-cylinder gasoline-only powertrain could get an honest 34 miles per gallon in highway driving. The Accord Hybrid was rated at 35 m.p.g. highway, but in actual driving it was lucky to top 30 m.p.g. The hybrid also needed pricier premium fuel.

So it never sold well. The $31,685 ($2,000 more with satellite radio and navigation) Accord Hybrid was marketed as a performance machine, which Honda concedes was a mistake. Sage Marie, a Honda spokesman, said the company is getting the message that hybrid buyers are primarily interested in high fuel economy numbers. Period. Lexus also had to defend its decision to put hybrid powertrains in its RX, GS and LS lines, which provide strong performance but little (if any) benefit in fuel economy.

It was interesting that Honda decided to kill the Accord rather than fix it. By dialing back the performance — perhaps transplanting the four-cylinder hybrid powertrain from the Civic Hybrid — the Accord Hybrid’s fuel economy numbers might have jumped into the mid- to low-40s.

This is the second hybrid Honda has killed in the past year, despite gasoline prices that are marching toward $4 a gallon. The Insight, the industry’s mileage king with mid-60s fuel economy, was axed last year.

So what is next for Honda’s hybrids, which are being outsold almost seven to one by Toyota’s hybrids?

The company is still moving ahead with plans for a high-economy vehicle to compete with the Toyota Prius by the 2009 model year.

Meanwhile, the Accord Hybrid will go down in Honda history as a misstep.

Chinese Auto Parts Enter the Global Market

JINZHOU, China — Zhao Qingjie’s favorite book, he says, is a Chinese translation of Lee A. Iacocca’s autobiography.

Mr. Zhao, who runs one of the largest manufacturers of automotive starters and alternators in China, has long been interested in the United States. That should make his counterparts in the auto parts industry elsewhere very nervous.

“Entering the U.S. market is one of our key strategies,” said Mr. Zhao, whose company, Wonder Auto Technology, has obtained a Wall Street stock listing and is preparing to start exporting.

China’s auto parts exports have increased more than sixfold in the last five years, nearly topping $1 billion in April and emerging as one of the fastest-growing categories of Chinese industrial products sold overseas. More than half of these auto parts go to the United States; most of the rest to Europe and Japan.

The rise of Chinese auto parts exports is part of a much broader shift. China is moving up from basic goods like textiles, toys and shoes and toward higher-value industrial goods that pay better wages — but also compete more directly with products from countries like Mexico and even from advanced industrialized countries like the United States.

Still, while China has room for considerable growth in auto parts exports to the United States, it is not competitive overseas in bulky products like car seats that are uneconomical to ship or need to be manufactured close to a car factory for quality-control reasons. And China’s rising labor costs and strengthening currency are making automakers leery of becoming too dependent on China for parts that can be shipped.

The latest wave of auto parts exports is led by domestic Chinese auto parts manufacturers like Wonder Auto that are rapidly gaining strength and starting to enter markets around the globe.

Domestic manufacturers like Wonder and the Wanxiang Group are relying on the same inexpensive Chinese assembly-line labor as multinationals like Delphi Automotive Systems and Visteon. But they can undercut the global giants in part by hiring talented but cheaper Chinese engineers and headquarters staff as well.

Soaring output at auto assembly plants in China is generating enormous demand for auto parts and creating the economies of large-scale production previously possible only in North America, Europe and Japan. And with at least a half-dozen Chinese automakers planning to start exporting in the next few years, Chinese auto parts will soon be going overseas not just in crates, but as part of fully assembled cars.

Multinational automakers set virtually the same quality standards for their operations all over the world. They are working closely with Chinese parts companies to help them meet these standards; once they do, they are allowed to submit bids for supplying factories elsewhere.

“They get put on the global list and then can quote for anything worldwide,” said Nick Reilly, the president of Asian and Pacific operations for General Motors.

Chinese auto parts have surged in the American market as imports have declined from Japan, Canada and Malaysia and have stagnated from Mexico and the European Union.

China is strongest in electrical and electronic components and in cast-metal parts that require environmentally hazardous casting and a lot of manual labor for machining.

Feeling the pinch are small auto parts manufacturers and their employees in the United States, heavily concentrated in Ohio and mainly supplying larger auto parts companies instead of shipping directly to the big automakers.

While overall American industrial production is on the upswing, the troubles of the auto parts industry could become an issue in next year’s presidential elections.

Ohio elected a new Democratic senator in November, Sherrod Brown, who favors a more aggressive American trade and currency policy, including the filing of legal cases with the World Trade Organization challenging China’s currency, labor and environmental policies.

“It’s not a fair competition because over and over again in terms of currency and labor standards, China doesn’t play by the same rules as we do in the United States,” Senator Brown said.

China is rapidly grabbing orders for replacement parts sold to repair garages. The Wanxiang Group of China is already building up its distribution in the United States by buying Neapco, a steering shaft company in Pottstown, Pa., and striking a deal with Ford in April to buy its prop shaft business.

Many of these imports from China are simply replacing goods from other countries. New starters and alternators, for example, are no longer made in the United States, as production has moved to Mexico, Singapore, Malaysia and now China.

But used starters and alternators are still remanufactured in the United States, reusing the costly copper wiring in each device and selling them in the $1.5 billion market for replacement starters and alternators. Companies in this business, like Motorcar Parts of America with its headquarters and main factory in Torrance, Calif., have been struggling to compete with imports of all-new starters and alternators.

Mr. Zhao of Wonder Auto calculates that it costs him $4 million to set up an assembly line here in Jinzhou with mostly manual labor, employing 20 workers.

The combined wages of 20 workers here come to only $40,000 a year at the current exchange rate of 7.65 yuan to the dollar. That is in the range of annual base pay for one unionized auto parts worker in the United States and comparable to two nonunion American auto parts workers. Mr. Zhao recently explored and rejected the idea of opening a factory in the United States, after calculating that it would cost $10 million to set up a heavily automated line that would employ three workers.

Total benefits for 20 workers come to an additional $20,000 a year, Mr. Zhao said.

The company’s wages of $170 a month remain respectable by the standards of this gritty refinery city of 800,000 in northeastern China. A small apartment without modern amenities like a refrigerator or air-conditioning rents for as little as $40 a month, while even a large meal at the restaurant of the city’s best hotel costs less than $3.

Jobs at Wonder Auto are much sought after and turnover is almost zero, said Sun Shaohua, 30, who strips copper wires for alternators, the devices that take mechanical energy from the engine and turn it into electricity to recharge the battery.

“Many people come, but nobody ever leaves,” he said.

Mr. Zhao said he was already in discussions with General Motors and Volkswagen about supplying their operations, first in China and then overseas. For now, Mr. Zhao mainly supplies domestic Chinese carmakers, notably Brilliance China Automotive, which has a high-roofed factory in Shenyang, a three-hour drive to the northeast, where workers in tan shirts and trousers labor at a modern assembly line.

While China’s auto parts industry is growing rapidly, automakers are nervous about buying all of their parts from China. They cite three important costs that are becoming increasingly unpredictable for any manufacturer doing business in China: labor costs, raw material costs and the exchange rate of the yuan against the dollar.

Industrial wages are still low in China compared with wages in other car manufacturing countries. But Chinese wages have been soaring by 10 to 30 percent a year for the last several years, auto executives said. Skilled workers at car factories in high-income coastal areas can earn nearly twice as much as workers here in northeastern China, a rust belt of aging industrial complexes built with Soviet help in the 1950s.

But even as China’s labor cost advantage is narrowing, it is simultaneously creating a new advantage: lower material costs.

As recently as four years ago, severe shortages within China of industrial commodities like high-quality steel resulted in high prices. Now the opposite is true: China has invested so much in new steel mills and other factories that it has become the world’s largest steel maker and faces an increasing glut.

The biggest question mark hanging over China’s exports lies in the currency exchange rate — a problem that Japanese auto executives in particular know well after dealing with the yen-dollar exchange rate.

China has allowed the yuan to appreciate only by 6 percent against the dollar in the nearly two years since breaking its fixed peg to the dollar. Chinese officials have repeatedly warned of their reluctance to accept faster appreciation.

But Chinese foreign exchange reserves have ballooned to $1.2 trillion from $316 billion in the last four years as Beijing has bought dollars on an enormous scale to prop up demand for the American currency and prevent it from falling faster against the yuan.

The question is how much longer Beijing can keep up these purchases, which require adroit handling to prevent them from causing inflation in China. Atsuyoshi Hyogo, who runs Honda’s China operations, said that China had slightly lower costs than its Japanese counterparts at currently prevailing exchange rates, but he added that the Chinese currency should be much stronger than it was now.

For all the uncertainty, Wonder Auto and other Chinese parts makers are growing quickly. Wonder’s sales rose 45.8 percent in the first quarter, to $21.6 million; profits nearly doubled, to $2.7 million.

Traded on the over-the-counter market in the United States, the company’s shares have risen more than fivefold since an initial public offering last June; Wonder Auto has applied for a Nasdaq listing. The rapid rise has enriched Mr. Zhao, who owns 54.2 percent of the company’s shares, worth more than $90 million, as well as 11 percent of another company in Jinzhou that manufactures air bag sensors.

That is quite a change from his earlier life. Forced to spend three years on a farm during the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s, Mr. Zhao taught himself to fix tractors. Denied admission to a naval academy because his father was a Nationalist soldier before the Communists won China’s civil war, Mr. Zhao went to a technical institute instead.

He became a business professor and ran a state-owned motorcycle shock-absorber factory before starting Wonder Auto.

Mr. Zhao said that he still worked 75 hours a week. His father died when Mr. Zhao was 6 years old, and for many years afterward he felt responsible for his two sisters and his mother.

“I had to let my mother know, in raising three kids, including a son, that it was all worth the hardship,” Mr. Zhao said. “As a boy from a small village, I want to make something of myself.”

Toyota Worldwide Hybrid Sales Top 1M

TOKYO -- Toyota said Thursday global sales of its hybrid vehicles have topped 1 million, a landmark for the Japanese automaker that leads the world in "green" cars.

Toyota Motor Corp.'s cumulative sales of gas-and-electric-powered vehicles totaled 1.047 million as of the end of May. Of those, nearly 345,000 hybrids were sold in Japan, while 702,000 were sold abroad, the company said in a statement.

The Prius is the clear leader, with a total of 757,600 units sold since its 1997 introduction in Japan. Toyota began selling the Prius in North America, Europe and other places in 2000. Last year, the model made up more than 40 percent of hybrid sales in the U.S.

Demand for hyrids, which deliver superior mileage by switching between a gasoline engine and electric motor, has soared amid higher oil prices and greater consumer concern about pollution and global warming.

Toyota offers several other hybrid models, including the hybrid Camry and hybrid Lexus models.

Toyota also began selling its most expensive hybrid, the $124,000 Lexus LS 600h, recently in Japan. It will be exported over the summer, according to the company.

Toyota produces its hybrids in Japan, in China since 2005, and in Kentucky since last year.

But not all hybrids sell well. Honda Motor Co. earlier this week said it will discontinue the hybrid version of its Accord sedans, which has done poorly. Sales of the Accord hybrid, available only in North America, totaled just 439 last month, while Toyota sold 24,000 Prius cars during the same period.

Last year, Honda said it will stop making the slow-selling Insight hybrid, but Honda is promising a new U.S. hybrid competitor in 2009.

Tokyo-based Honda continues to sell the hybrid Civic, which has sold more than 153,000 since going on sale in 2001 in Japan, Europe and North America.

Ford gets 5 top quality awards

Porsche takes the top spot and Mercedes is most improved brand in latest J.D. Power survey


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Five vehicles from Ford Motor Co. placed at the top of their categories in initial quality, according to a survey released Wednesday by J.D. Power and Associates.

The 2007 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study looks at both manufacturing defects and design problems in new cars as reported by their owners.

The Ford Mustang ranked as the most problem-free "Midsize sporty car" in the survey while the Mercury Milan was the highest ranked midsized car and the closely related Lincoln MKZ was the top-ranked "Entry premium car."

The Lincoln Mark LT, a luxury version of the Ford F150 truck, was the top-ranked SUV and the Mazda MX-5 Miata was the top-ranked "compact sporty car." (Ford owns a controlling interest in Mazda.)

All three of Ford's U.S.-based brands - Ford, Lincoln and Mercury - earned above-average marks for quality. Ford's European luxury car brand Jaguar ranked sixth, tying with Toyota's Toyota brand.

The overall top brand, on average, was Porsche with 91 problems per 100 vehicles. (The average car in the survey had 125 problems per 100 vehicles.) The Porsche Boxster was the top-ranked "Compact premium sporty car," according to the survey.

The second-ranked brand overall was Toyota's Lexus luxury brand followed by Lincoln, Honda and Mercedes-Benz.

The Mercedes-Benz SL-class was the top-ranked "Premium sporty car" and the E-class was the top-ranked "midsize premium car." The Mercedes-Benz S-class tied with the Audi A8 as the top-ranked "large premium car."

Mercedes-Benz has not done well in J.D. Power surveys in the past but jumped 20 places in the rankings this year to finish fifth.

"All Mercedes-Benz models in the study improved substantially," said Neal Oddes, director of product research and analysis for J.D. Power, in the announcement, "and the breadth and speed of these improvements demonstrates the Mercedes-Benz commitment to quality."

No GM brands earned above-average scores in the survey. GM's best-ranking brand was Buick with 127 problems per 100 vehicles, a score that placed it just below average. Several individual GM models did earn top rankings, however.

The highest ranking brand from DaimlerChrysler's U.S.-based division, the Chrysler Group, was Chrysler. Chrysler had 151 problems per 100 vehicles, placing it well below average.

At the bottom of the scale, Ford's luxury SUV division, Land Rover, ranked last of all brands with 170 problems per 100 vehicles. Still, that represents a reduction of 34 problems per 100 vehicles from last year.

Despite taking the top spot in the "small sporty car" segment with the Miata, Mazda finished second-to-last among brands overall with 163 problems per 100 vehicles.

Top ranked vehicles

Subcompact: Kia Rio/Rio5

Compact: Honda Civic

Compact sporty: Mazda MX-5 Miata

Compact premium sporty: Porsche Boxster

Entry Premium: Lincoln MKZ

Midsized premium: Mercedes-Benz E-class

Large premium: Audi A8/Mercedes-Benz S-class

Premium sporty: Mercedes-Benz SL-class

Midsized sporty: Ford Mustang

Midsize: Mercury Milan

Large: Pontiac Grand Prix

Compact SUV: Honda CR-V

Midsize SUV: Toyota 4Runner

Lage SUV: Toyota Sequoia

Midsize Premium SUV: Lexus RX

Large Premium SUV: Lincoln Mark LT

Large pickup: Chevrolet Silverado Classic HD

Midsize pickup: Toyota Tacoma

Van: Chevrolet Express

Source: J.D. Power and Associates

A Grand Opening for BMW’s Quick-Tanning Machine

DRIVING a BMW 3 Series after some time away is like being reunited with a favorite band. The in-line 6 sounds its opening notes and you think, “Hey, I remember that song.”

The car picks up the tempo and glides through a tricky two-lane passage, and your hips shimmy right along. As the performance approaches a lighter-waving climax, you’re reminded that, among sport sedans, the 3 Series is like Dylan or the Clash: the one you can always come back to.

Of course, a company doesn’t keep a car on top for 30 years by rehashing the past, but through regular reinvention.

The Bangle school of styling that so provoked BMW purists (their motto: forever square) with its restless kinks and bulges, has grown into a mature, often-imitated style that can no longer be casually dismissed. The look definitely flatters the 3 Series. It was liberally applied to the fifth-generation sedan for 2006. A coupe soon followed, along with a welcome rarity, a wagon as fun and shapely as it is practical.

On an unreasonably cold spring morning, I pulled on a wool hat to avoid spoiling my first date with the luxurious 335i convertible. Starting at $49,875, it is the most expensive and style-conscious of the current 3 Series lineup. (A new limited-edition 420-horsepower M3, featuring the first V-8 ever installed in the series, will top the range later next year).

Having failed for years to outhandle and outfinesse the BMW, the competition has been trying to hammer it into submission. The best of the budget alternatives is Infiniti and its recently redesigned G35. A more powerful G37 coupe — on sale in August, with a sedan version to follow — will develop a class-leading 330 horsepower from a 3.7-liter V-6.

Such V-6 engines take up less space than in-line sixes of the same displacement. And BMW could no longer stretch its smaller, 3-liter in-line 6 and still fit it under the 3 Series hood. So to keep the sport-sedan stalkers at bay, it had to whip out the automotive version of pepper spray: a pair of quick-spooling turbochargers boost the direct-injection 6 to a nice round 300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque. Even the burly new M3 with the V-8 will produce 5 less pound-feet of torque (295) than the turbo models.

That makes the 335i the first turbocharged gasoline-powered BMW sold in the United States. The engine makes a vocal argument to being the best turbo powerplant this side of a $130,000 Porsche. Free-spinning and seamless, it evinces none of the power lag or spiky peaks you expect from turbochargers, achieving peak torque at a low 1,400 r.p.m.

The result is a 3 Series that feels roughly as quick, but less high-strung, than the current-generation M3 (rated at 333 horsepower). For the new convertible, BMW cites a snappy 5.5-second run from 0 to 60 m.p.h. when equipped with the terrific six-speed manual transmission — only two-tenths of a second behind the 335i coupe. If you don’t want to pump a clutch pedal, the $1,275 six-speed Steptronic is among the fastest and smoothest automatics around; don’t forget to throw in $100 for paddle shifters.

Trusty brakes feature every imaginable technology, including a self-drying feature that ensures that they are always ready for action on a puddly day. The brakes automatically keep the car from rolling backward when you’re starting off on an uphill slope, a feature every luxury car should consider.

Blessedly, the 3 Series can be ordered without the iDrive systems interface and its dreaded rotary control knob. And the Active Steering — which adjusts steering ratios to make for easier parking and supposedly better handling — is another option whose price, $1,400, isn’t justified by the benefits.

For style, speed and handling you can see and feel, choose instead the $1,300 sport package. It adds a firmer suspension, sport seats with power adjustable side bolsters and handsome 18-inch wheels with sticky run-flat performance tires. It also raises the top speed limitation to 150 m.p.h., compared with just 130 m.p.h. without the package.

During my blast north of New York along the Hudson River, the BMW’s mad turbocharged rush was a new thrill. More familiar was the unity of power, steering, shifter and brakes that no other car in this class can quite reproduce. The suspension is supple when you want it, firm when you need it, and the car will cruise or command any road, depending on your mood.

With the day warming and my hair whipping, I tried and failed to think of a hotter combination of four seats, open roof and excellent performance at this price. The 3 Series defies the stereotype of convertibles as fair-weather toys, and that real men and enthusiasts must do their serious road hunting from inside a closed-roof cave.

The 3 Series also addresses a longstanding bane of convertibles: the combination of tender thighs and searing-hot seats. The seats, armrests and shift knob feature BMW’s so-called sun-reflective technology. The leather is treated with pigments that BMW claims will reduce surface temperatures of dark-leather seats by up to 36 degrees on sunny days or 27 degrees for lighter-colored leathers.

Count the power hardtop as another first on a BMW. On the plus side, the top powers down in a fleet 22 seconds, and it takes just one second longer to click shut. The side and rear glass areas are together more than 30 percent larger than those of the prior cloth-top convertible, minimizing blind spots, letting in light and greatly improving visibility, including the view from the back seat.

But as with most folding hardtops, the roof adds weight and complexity, and seriously reduces the trunk space when stowed. At 3,946 pounds, the Bimmer weighs about 400 pounds more than the coupe. About 300 of that is because of the top, the rest from the stiffened structure that convertibles require to keep tremors at bay. Watching the top’s stacking, origami action is breathtaking, but so is the thought of how much it might cost to fix after a decade of use.

With the top down, trunk space drops from 12.3 cubic feet to 7.4, though it seemed smaller. With the roof open, I tried and failed to stow two wheeled carry-ons. A clever $500 Comfort Access option lets you open or close the top with the key fob, or to partly raise the roof for easier access to luggage.

As ever with BMW, the phrase “You get what you pay for” is both a compliment and caveat. My beautiful bright-blue 335i checked in at $54,540. Worth every penny, I’d say, but that’s still a whole lot of pennies.

So allow a word of praise for the 328i versions, whether sedan, coupe or convertible. (The 328i convertible starts at $43,975.) The starter Bimmers used to feel like something you settled for, with smaller engines and well under 200 horsepower. But the latest 328i models get a robust 230 horsepower from a 3-liter aluminum-magnesium 6, and the engine is so flexible that you’d swear it had 30 more horses in reserve.

Yes, a twin-turbo 300-horsepower BMW convertible is the stuff of summer dreams. The 328i model helps to keep that dream more attainable.




GM's Oshawa Plant Tops Productivity List


The Toyota Motor Corp. led all North American automakers in manufacturing productivity last year, but Detroit's Big Three continued to close the productivity gap with their Japanese rivals, said The Harbour Report, a study watched closely by the auto industry.

The annual report prepared by Troy, Mich.-based Harbour Consulting, compared labor productivity at six companies that have North American plants. The study covered the installation of auto equipment and integration of parts and accessories like the Jet Chips cold air intake. The General Motors Corp. had four of the top ten most productive vehicle assembly plants, including the most productive plant in the study - Oshawa No. 2 in Oshawa, Ont. It took Toyota 29.93 work hours to manufacture components and assemble each vehicle.

"Topping the Harbour Report is a great achievement at a time when productivity is a critical challenge facing Canada's economy," said Arturo Elias, the GM Canada president. "This really shows what can be accomplished with constant focus and it is a testament to our great employees at GM Canada."

Harbour Consulting president Ron Harbour said that the difference between the most and least productive companies last year was 5.17 hours, more than two hours better than the 7.33-hour gap in 2005. Yet the gap still is equal to about $300 per vehicle in favour of Toyota, the study said.

The productivity gain came because Toyota's performance declined while the Detroit Three continued to increase. Ford and GM became more productive by slashing thousands of workers through buyouts and early retirement offers, and all three continued to work with unions to negotiate away work rules that place them at a disadvantage to the Japanese companies, Harbour said.

The improvements came even though sales and production declined for all three Detroit automakers, he said. "I think it's a major point that Ford, Chrysler and GM all made improvements despite the fact that they all had some significant drops in volume," he said. "When you're losing production volume that fast, it's pretty hard to make productivity improvements."

Ford, GM and Chrysler could narrow the gap even further in 2007, because they did not fully realize the full impact of productivity improvements in 2006, Harbour said. "One of them could even overtake Toyota if production volumes don't drop too much. We should see a big improvement in the Big Three's numbers overall in 2007."

Joe Hinrichs, Ford's vice president of North American manufacturing, said that although his company is behind competitors, it has seen five straight years of productivity improvements. "Our rate of improvement was better than some," Hinrichs said. He added that Ford has worked with union leaders on forging agreements to make plants more efficient. That includes allowing workers to do multiple jobs and contracting out traditional union jobs to save money.

Harbour said that such agreements are a necessity as the Detroit Three try to return to profitability. According to the study, Ford lost US$5,234 per vehicle before taxes last year, followed by GM with a $1,436 loss and DaimlerChrysler, which lost $1,072 per vehicle. On the contrary, Toyota made $1,266 per vehicle, while Honda made $1,368 and Nissan made $1,575. While Harbour gives the United Auto Workers and Canadian Auto Workers credit for helping the Detroit Three reduce costs, he said more must be done in the upcoming U.S. national contract talks. He added, "They have really come to the party here and made some really big improvements. But there are still some things out there."

The Detroit Three have to erase productivity differences at any cost because their viability depends on it, Harbour said.

Home Page

A Sleeping Beauty Since ’62, Rare Bugatti Awaits Its Comeback



AMONG serious collectors, there are few mysteries; with only occasional exceptions, cars of particular significance have all been deeply researched and their histories well-documented. A Duesenberg or Ferrari expert knows when an important example will be coming to auction and can typically recite its ownership history in numbing detail, referring to the car not by something as vague as a model name but by its exact chassis number.

That is why the grapevine of the collector market buzzes when a rare car re-emerges after being out of sight for many years. Such is the case — and the source of anticipation — surrounding the French grand touring car from 1938, a Bugatti Type 57C Atalante coupé. One of about 40 built, the Atalante is the last design of a talented young man before his early death, and one of the most daring shapes of its time.

Adding to its mystique, the car, owned by a member of one of New York’s most prominent families, had not seen the light of day since 1962, when it was last registered for the road. The Atalante has not moved from its garage space — it is now sandwiched between a old Farmall tractor and a 1949 Jaguar Mark V sedan — in a New York City suburb since then. It will be auctioned on June 3 by Christie’s at the Greenwich Concours d’Élégance, at Roger Sherman Baldwin Park in Greenwich, Conn. Christie’s estimates that the car will sell for $300,000 to $400,000.

While noncollectors might be shocked by that price for a car in this state of neglect, its as-found condition adds charm for many would-be Bugatti owners. Many vintage cars, even from the grandest marques, have suffered untold indignities, but this Atalante is remarkably original — with little more than small repairs at the rear and the addition of bumpers — and it has never sustained the harm of a botched restoration.

Its value is related to Bugatti’s status as one of the most revered names in automotive history, memorable enough for the Volkswagen Group to revive the brand in recent years for a series of ultraexpensive sports cars.

The founder of the company, Ettore Bugatti, built his first car in 1899 and gave them his name in 1910, when he established his company in the Alsace region, then under German control. Bugatti soon became known for superbly engineered racecars, one of which won the first Monaco Grand Prix in 1929. To finance the racing, the company built powerful cars for wealthy enthusiasts, a business model later adopted by Enzo Ferrari.

Ettore’s son, Jean, grew up in the business and established himself as an imaginative and talented automotive engineer and designer. Jean, who died in 1939 while testing a racecar, designed the bodies for the Type 57 models.

Of the 710 Type 57s built, about 40 carried the sleek two-door coupé body named Atalante, after the quick-footed young woman of Greek mythology who would not marry any man who could not outrun her.

The owner of this particular Bugatti is John Wendell Straus. Mr. Straus, 87, is a grandson of Isador Straus, who built R.H. Macy & Co. into a retail giant and who, with his wife, Ida, was among those lost on the Titanic in 1912.

John W. Straus has loved cars since childhood. His first, at the age of 14, was a Ford Model T that he kept for many years. As a student at Harvard, he spent much of his free time looking for old cars abandoned in fields near the Cambridge campus. He joined the military in 1942, where, as a pilot in the Army Air Force with a fluency in French, he trained Free French airmen in Alabama.

After the war he joined the family business; as a Macy’s vice president he was deeply involved in the Thanksgiving Day Parade and served as the store’s liaison to the production team of “Miracle on 34th Street” when it filmed in Manhattan.

Mr. Straus often found himself at Zumbach Motors on West 54th Street, one of the first foreign car repair shops in New York and a gathering place for show business personalities like Paul Whiteman and Dave Garroway. It was there one day in the early 1950s that Straus saw a rakish black and yellow Bugatti. It was not just the car’s looks that convinced him he had to own it, but also the obvious care and craftsmanship that went into its construction.

The car had originally left the Bugatti factory in Molsheim, then in France, with a convertible body and the optional supercharged engine. An early owner of this car also owned an Atalante coupé; the coupé originally came with the less powerful version of the Type 57 engine, a 135-horsepower in-line eight cylinder.

In the late 1940s the body of the convertible was swapped with that of the coupé, mating the 160-horsepower engine with the rarer coupé body. Such exchanges were not uncommon at the time, with some well-to-do owners regularly changing the body style of their car seasonally to suit their moods.

The Bugatti joined other cars in Mr. Straus’s garage, which over the years included a Rolls-Royce Phantom I, several Jaguars, a late-1930s Mercedes-Benz 540K, his original Ford Model T and a Duesenberg that had been purchased new by his father. They all saw service driving his family between New York City and their country homes in Westchester County.

Mr. Straus became involved in education and the arts during the ’60s and left Macy’s in 1968 to begin a second career in education. He later became an consultant serving on the boards of many arts organizations. All this activity left little time for his cars and one by one they were parked, not to be driven again.

It is exactly this sort of unrestored car that has helped the Christie’s auction at the annual Greenwich concours make something of a name for itself.

“In selling a ‘barn find’ car, we find that you have to market it correctly,” said Christopher Sanger, vice president in charge of sales for Christie’s motor car department in the United States. “A picture’s worth a thousand words — you need the right images to create the proper mood, by showing the car as discovered so people can appreciate how undisturbed it is.”

Finding cars like this is also a part of the competition between auction houses. “We’re all striving to find fresh-to-the-market cars — important and rare cars that have been tucked away in collections and lost to time,” Mr. Sanger said.

Restoring a car purchased in original condition like this requires special care. Alex Finigan, sales manager of Paul Russell & Company in Essex, Mass., a shop that regularly works for top collectors, said that the work should start with documentation. “The process is that we photograph literally every nut and bolt. Although we’ve worked on many Bugattis, they’re all different.

“We study any period factory photos as well,” he said. “This is all before a wrench touches the car. It’s very important to identify what is original and what may have been added later.”

Restoration on a car like the Bugatti can take up to 6,000 hours of labor and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. In 2006, a restored Atalante sold at the Gooding auction at Pebble Beach for $682,000.

For the person who buys this Bugatti, it will be akin to the thrill of an archaeologist at a dig site, combined with that of the museum curator who finally puts the object on display. It’s like unearthing a lost treasure, then bringing it out into the light of the world to be celebrated once again. By any measure of desirability, it’s worth the effort.

The Greenwich Concours d’Élégance will take place from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, June 2-3, at Roger Sherman Baldwin Park in Greenwich, Conn.

Palm to Sell Device That Won’t Fit in the Palm

CARLSBAD, Calif., May 30 — Fifteen years after pioneering personal computers that nestled comfortably in a user’s hand, Palm reversed itself Wednesday and said that it would begin selling a two-handed laptop-size machine called the Foleo.

The 2.5-pound “appliance” comes with a 10-inch screen and is meant to be a companion for a smartphone, according to one of Palm’s founders, Jeff Hawkins, who introduced the machine here at the D: All Things Digital technology industry conference.

The Foleo, which will be priced starting at $499, synchronizes information with Palm and Windows Mobile phones and can be linked wirelessly via phones to the Internet, although it comes with Wi-Fi ability.

During a demonstration, Mr. Hawkins acknowledged the limitations of smartphones, which have been viewed as a lighter, less expensive alternative to carrying a portable laptop computer. “Sometimes you need a big screen,” Mr. Hawkins said.

He said he had struck on the idea of a mobile companion for the phone five years ago, but that his business partners Donna Dubinsky and Ed Colligan had resisted the project as a distraction while the company introduced the popular Treo smartphones.

The Foleo, which will go on sale this summer, is based on the Linux operating system. But it does not have a broad range of applications. For example, while Mr. Hawkins demonstrated the ability to synchronize e-mail automatically with a smartphone, synchronizing with a datebook was not a feature.

The notion of an inch-thick device that is sold as a peripheral to a phone generated some skepticism. But several analysts saidt the phone might get a following of Linux enthusiasts.

“This could become the first commercially viable portable Linux system,” said Tim Bajarin, an industry analyst at Creative Strategies, a consulting firm based in Campbell, Calif.

The Foleo is the latest in a series of industry efforts to define a new category between cellphones and laptops. Microsoft has tried to create interest in devices it calls ultra-mobile PCs, and Intel has been encouraging developers to introduce systems it describes as mobile Internet devices.

Several smaller start-up companies like Oqo, based in San Francisco, have also been offering hand-held systems that have most of the features of standard laptops, but fit comfortably in jacket pockets.

This year’s conference also included an interview with Apple’s chief executive, Steven P. Jobs. Mr. Jobs said his company would soon be focused on three business — computers, digital music, and cellular telephone handsets — and “a hobby,” the company’s recently introduced Apple TV peripheral.

He called the device an experiment and said it would soon make it possible to download videos from the YouTube site of Google onto a home TV.

He described efforts by PC and consumer electronics companies and others to replace the cable set-top box as failures. Apple has recently reset its strategy and is going to try to shape Apple TV as something other than a conduit for television.

“We want to be the DVD player for the Internet age,” he said.

Mr. Jobs also said that more than two hundred million copies of the Apple iTunes software had been downloaded, with most of them running on Windows-based personal computers.

He did not let that fact pass without taking a not-so-subtle jab at his long-time competitor, Bill Gates, Microsoft’s founder: Offering iTunes software to Windows users was like “offering a glass of water to someone in hell,” Mr. Jobs said.

Home Page

US car sales recovery led by GM

Demand for hybrid and smaller passenger cars amid rising fuel prices helped US car sales rebound from a weak spring.

General Motors (GM) led the increase as sales were up 12.8% on May last year after it sold 371,056 light vehicles.

Elsewhere, Japanese rival Toyota ousted US group Ford from the number two spot with a 10% jump in sales while Ford sales sank 6.9%.

Sales were driven by smaller, more fuel efficient cars as petrol prices hit record highs around $3 a gallon.

"We saw strong total and retail sales increases," said GM's vice president of North American sales, Mark LaNeve.

"Our significant market share gains in full-size trucks and crossovers validates the decision we made to invest in industry-leading fuel economy in these important segments."

Overall, sales of GM cars rose 16.2% while light truck sales gained 5.6%.

Fuel worries

Toyota car sales also rose 16.2% - as Camry passenger cars sales rose and its sales of its hybrid Prius surged to a record 24,009 from 8,103 in May last year. Light truck sales rose 10.9%.

"As fuel prices and consumer confidence rose, the industry saw a move to passenger cars," said Jim Lentz, Toyota's US executive vice president.

Elsewhere, fellow Asian carmaker Nissan also recorded a 7.4% increase in sales, thanking a good performance from its fuel-efficient small cars for the rise.

DaimlerChrysler - which last month agreed to sell a majority stake in its ailing US arm to Cerberus Capital for 5.5bn euros ($7.41bn; £3.7bn) - also said sales were up 3.9%.

On the downside, Ford - the second biggest carmaker in the US - and Asian carmaker Honda both unveiled a decline in sales.

Ford said overall vehicle sales fell 6.9% as car sales dropped by 17.7% while truck sales remained flat.

The company blamed slackening demand for its saloon cars and a planned cut in sales to rental fleets.

Home Page